haydn callow wrote:Not sure where you are coming from there Mike.....If when you changed the gauge it went from zero to 11 o'clock in five mins instead of 10 mins....the cooling system it'self hasn't changed at all and the actual temps are no differant....it's just that the 2 gauges have differant parameters(or one was damaged).......(bending the needle would also give differant readings but down below all is the same). Your Bongo was still taking the same amount of time to reach whatever temp it was reaching....one of your gauges was telling lies.
I do not put myself forward as a expert and am quite open to being shot down...not a problem....in the diagram post I put forward the thought that the stat fails open and was corrected...after studying a stat I now see that this is the case...however there are 2/3 peeps on this forum who are very knowledgeable and they are as we speak putting their heads together for the good of us all...long may they do so...it really is a very informative topic....however I also think we non experts con somtimes put forward valid views....
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarghhhhhhhh. Sorry, should have made it clearer. It didn't change the gauge, I changed the thermostat. The needle on the gauge then only took 5 mins or less to move off the COLD end stop towards 11.00 oclock, whereas before it took 10 mins or more to do it. There was a very clear change in the gauges behaviour (and in the time for car heaters to work)
Kirsty - I've tried reading that thread. Can't manage all 10 pages (pl. forgive me) but this comment from widdowson summed it up for me:
I read through that post (marathon job ) and gleaned quite a lot from it. Take out the 'handbags at dawn' stuff and the numerous diversions, it made very interesting reading.
One thing it did highlight, and this one is showing similar signs, is that no one really is 100% sure how the system works in the finer detail. But I think it is only the finer detail where folk are disagreeing.
Going back to object of the excercise, from my perspective, all I am trying to get out of this is an accurate diagram which I can print out, take to the van, and and check things out.
Prior to that the thread had directed me to the factsheet in the members area, which I read with some concern. Its a useful cut and paste of useful observations (no more) from previous threads, just about all of which I'm familiar with, but I was concerned about some puzzling inclusions. Like this, under 'Possible Causes' [of overheating]:
7. Manifold gasket blown
Usually accompanied by lots of steam and a high-pitched squealing noise. The
number one stud is particularly vulnerable and, if snapped, may need drilling out
and replacing.
I'd expect the factsheet author to know that squealing, broken studs and exhaust manifolds (and their gaskets) was one issue (that has bothing to do with overheating), and head gaskets and lots of steam (in the exhaust tract) was another
Later on, the famous authoritative looking diagram appears though (as its creator has always acknowledged) it is not an authoritative diagram on the Bongo coolant system, but someones best guess. As others have observed (e.g. stilldesparate on the thread you pointed me to) its a moot point whether the outlet from the radiator top hose should be in red or blue (I'd say blue, as its cooled coolant). It'd be nice to see the water pump include in the circuitry too.
My overall problem with all of this is that none of us are Bongo coolant system experts. Even the best of us - Dandy and TGP come to mind as two who lead the field - are struggling to be certain (its noticeable that Dandy is frank about that - to his credit, as it ensures others don't hang on his words when they shouldn't). In the face of that, I think:
* The practical tips are the best stuff
* leave theory out of factsheets as much as poss. and accept that until we get a definitive expalantion from a suitable Mazda engineer (which I'd love to explore the possibility of - anyone got an idea how we might do that?) its best to stress that we are guessing.
* Re-evaluate ideas in the light of evidence/observations that suggest it might be good to do so.