That will please tigs and vindicate Mike's views on "unknown" tyres.simon heaton wrote:scanner,
they've been on for 8 months , i'm a hard cornerer, grip has been excellent in wet and dry, got slight wear on outside cos tracking out by a miniscule amount other than that i will be ordering more when the time comes.
At £55 approx you couldn't get better.... (well happy)
Wheels!
Moderators: Doone, westonwarrior
- mikeonb4c
- Supreme Being
- Posts: 22877
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:49 pm
- Location: Living with Mango Bongo in the North West but with a tendency to roam
- Contact:
Hope tigs is reading.
She Who Dares Wins
This is indeed great news, and for me as I search for replacements (but in no hurry).
HiddenMission wrote
Very interesting thread this. Tigs where are you?

PS - esp with low profile tyres I reckon check tyres pressures religously. They don't give much of a clue when they are running low on air pressure (not much wall to bulge)
She Who Dares Wins



This is indeed great news, and for me as I search for replacements (but in no hurry).
HiddenMission wrote
I know, no idea how you find out, which is why I wrote as I did. It's as though a compound that is regarded as cheap and poor grip by some (owners of lighter cars seeking megagrip and for whom tyre replacement cost is beneath their gaze) is perfectly suited to another. I mean, you can't get ANY Bongo tyre much under £55. It does sound as thogh the sumo tyres are a hard compound.Mike, thanks for your reply, but not too sure what you mean by a "hard compound" or how I would translate that into new tyres.
Very interesting thread this. Tigs where are you?

PS - esp with low profile tyres I reckon check tyres pressures religously. They don't give much of a clue when they are running low on air pressure (not much wall to bulge)
-
- Bongolier
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: Idle, Bradford, West Yorkshire
- Contact:
It could be argued by the police or an insurer that they are not fit for purpose as they do not satisfy the minimum load capacity for the vehicle the are fitted to.
Bongos need 96 or 710Kg per tyre load capacity on the rear axle it says so on the plate just inside the driver's door.
94 only gives 670kg per tyre...................... http://www.tyresave.co.uk/tyreload.html
Bongos need 96 or 710Kg per tyre load capacity on the rear axle it says so on the plate just inside the driver's door.
94 only gives 670kg per tyre...................... http://www.tyresave.co.uk/tyreload.html
-
- Bongolier
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:32 pm
hi all,
what i forgot to say is that they are also extra load so the side walls are stiffer.I check prices here http://www.valuetyres.co.uk. , but order them from my local tyre dealer (a bit cheaper.)
On my bongo tyre loads are front 92 front and 96 rear.(label inside door)
what i forgot to say is that they are also extra load so the side walls are stiffer.I check prices here http://www.valuetyres.co.uk. , but order them from my local tyre dealer (a bit cheaper.)
On my bongo tyre loads are front 92 front and 96 rear.(label inside door)
Simon
I'm Bongoing mad R U?
I'm Bongoing mad R U?
-
- Supreme Being
- Posts: 10637
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Ince Lancs
Hiddenmission? It would appear from the tyre size you quoted that you have 18" wheels,as opposed to your earlier statement of 17" wheels.
I run 40 p.s.i. in mine, the official mazda tyre pressure qoutations are thrown out of the window as you are running a non standard size wheel/tyre.
Its just possible, that your shock absorbers are kapput! If the rebound of the spring and shock absorber are out of kilter,its possible to knock small chunks out of the tyre,as the spring and the shock absorber are fighting against each other,if the shocks are knackered.
I'm assuming that all the tracking and wheel geometry has been checked and set-up correctly? Wheels balanced etc?
I run 40 p.s.i. in mine, the official mazda tyre pressure qoutations are thrown out of the window as you are running a non standard size wheel/tyre.
Its just possible, that your shock absorbers are kapput! If the rebound of the spring and shock absorber are out of kilter,its possible to knock small chunks out of the tyre,as the spring and the shock absorber are fighting against each other,if the shocks are knackered.
I'm assuming that all the tracking and wheel geometry has been checked and set-up correctly? Wheels balanced etc?
ビッグダディケイン RIP Big Bank Hank (Imp the Dimp) 1957-2014
I agree with above comments, and would have to say I would run minimum of 92s on front and 96s on rear....
but here are my thoughts......
92s and 96s are load rated at 630 and 710 kg
from this site.... a bongo weighs 1770 kg (can't remember if that is aft or bongolow, but doesn't really matter, just stay with me)
this implys the bongo has a 47% front to 53% rear weight distribution
then from those weights
2 x 630 added to 2 x 710 is 2680
so I reckon the mazda engineers licked their engineering fingers and said add a percentage to that for load......
and if right that percentage comes pretty close to 50%
1770 x 150% is 2655
but you will have load.....
add say 4 people 320kg (?)
camping gear 100kg
canoe, bikes, dogs, side conversion.... etc etc
that 50% is pretty quickly swallowed up......
which I why I wouldn't risk running lower rated tyres...
1, my family are inside (and to me worth an extra few quid a tyre!)
2, though noone knows about bongos, say you take 7 mates up to the NEC.... if they are built like me you could have 900kg of people alone in there!!.... if you then crashed and blocked the motorway... .when they investigated the crash and found you'd overloaded the tyres.... what would you get?
John
but here are my thoughts......
92s and 96s are load rated at 630 and 710 kg
from this site.... a bongo weighs 1770 kg (can't remember if that is aft or bongolow, but doesn't really matter, just stay with me)
this implys the bongo has a 47% front to 53% rear weight distribution
then from those weights
2 x 630 added to 2 x 710 is 2680
so I reckon the mazda engineers licked their engineering fingers and said add a percentage to that for load......
and if right that percentage comes pretty close to 50%
1770 x 150% is 2655
but you will have load.....
add say 4 people 320kg (?)
camping gear 100kg
canoe, bikes, dogs, side conversion.... etc etc
that 50% is pretty quickly swallowed up......
which I why I wouldn't risk running lower rated tyres...
1, my family are inside (and to me worth an extra few quid a tyre!)
2, though noone knows about bongos, say you take 7 mates up to the NEC.... if they are built like me you could have 900kg of people alone in there!!.... if you then crashed and blocked the motorway... .when they investigated the crash and found you'd overloaded the tyres.... what would you get?
John
bigdaddy - I did say I wasn't an expert
, so yes looks like they are 18".
Simon thanks for the tip with the sumo tyres.
To sum up my options -
First, I need to check that tyres are correctly inflated - again, is there a definitive way of determining the correct trye pressure?
I should consider getting 96s, as opposed to 92s on the rear
I should maybe look at some sumo tyres, 235/45/18s
The long and short of it seems to be that if you don't have standard wheels, you need to invest a bit more time and care in tyre maintenance, and work out the correct configurations. I was a bit freaked out by the damage described on the tyres replaced, so I don't want to make an mistakes with this.
Thanks again

Simon thanks for the tip with the sumo tyres.
To sum up my options -
First, I need to check that tyres are correctly inflated - again, is there a definitive way of determining the correct trye pressure?
I should consider getting 96s, as opposed to 92s on the rear
I should maybe look at some sumo tyres, 235/45/18s
The long and short of it seems to be that if you don't have standard wheels, you need to invest a bit more time and care in tyre maintenance, and work out the correct configurations. I was a bit freaked out by the damage described on the tyres replaced, so I don't want to make an mistakes with this.
Thanks again

-
- Supreme Being
- Posts: 10637
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Ince Lancs
It was quite unscientific H.M. In my case, i simply kept on putting air in till there was what i considered to be a reasonable amount of visible "bulge" at the bottom of the tyre.HiddenMission wrote:
First, I need to check that tyres are correctly inflated - again, is there a definitive way of determining the correct tyre pressure?
I experimented for a while with various pressures, till i reached what i considered to be a reasonable compromise.
ビッグダディケイン RIP Big Bank Hank (Imp the Dimp) 1957-2014
Only trouble with the valuetyres site in respect of this discussion is that it doesn't show the load rating of the tyres so you can't tell if they are adequate for the Bongo's needs.simon heaton wrote:hi all,
what i forgot to say is that they are also extra load so the side walls are stiffer.I check prices here http://www.valuetyres.co.uk. , but order them from my local tyre dealer (a bit cheaper.)
http://www.camskill.co.uk & http://www.blackcircles.co.uk are better for that info.
-
- Bongolier
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:32 pm






and a set of sumo



Am shattered have been running around trying to get the things fitted all day,




