URGENT: MOT failure on registration plate

Technical questions and answers about the Mazda Bongo

Moderators: Doone, westonwarrior

Locked
RobnKathryn

URGENT: MOT failure on registration plate

Post by RobnKathryn » Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:23 pm

My van was MOT'd on Christmas eve and failed on registration plate, incorrect character width and height.
I have until 5pm today for free retest and have just purchased a new set of plates which the supplier swears comply with regs. But they're exactly the same as the ones i already have (a bit annoying since the supplier looked at the old ones 1st!)
The MOT man is adamant that they're not legal, and the supplier is adamant that they are. They look exactly the same as all Bongo's have, standard Jap plate.
Any ideas anyone??
The MOT man also tried to say it would fail because the middle seat belts had nowhere to go (i have reversed my middle seats) and the front door catch was stiff. These items miraculously disappeared after a spot of arguing and an extra £10 as a Christmas drink, but the guy is not moving on the no. plates.
trevd01

Post by trevd01 » Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:35 pm

In an earlier thread ...
trevd01 wrote:I think you will find that somewhere in some regulations you will find that there is a dispensation for Japanese imports to be allowed smaller plates, yep found it:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Numberplates
Once your vehicle has been allocated a UK registration number, it must be displayed on front and rear numberplates in accordance with UK requirements. Failure to meet the requirements is an offence attracting a maximum fine of up to £1,000 and in some cases the registration mark may be withdrawn. The police can also issue fixed penalty fines for illegally displayed numberplates and vehicles may also fail the annual vehicle MoT test. It is an offence to alter, rearrange or misrepresent letters or numbers in order to form names or words; e.g. A242 ABC must not be displayed as A242A BC.

For vehicles first registered on after 1 January 1973, the characters must be black, the background must be reflex-reflecting material, white at the front and yellow at the rear. Each number plate shall be permanently and legibly marked in such a position as to be clearly visible when the number plate is fitted to the vehicle, with the following information: (i) the name, trade mark or other means of identification of the maker; (ii) the number of the British Standard, i.e. BS AU 145a.

New or Replacement Plates Fitted from 1 September 2001 must be fitted in accordance with BS AU 145d, and show (i) the number of the BS (i.e. BS AU 145d), (ii) the name trade mark or other means of identification of the manufacturer or component supplier; (iii) name and postcode of the supplying of identification of the manufacturer or component supplier; (iv) name and postcode of the supplying outlet.

Certain imported vehicles may be permitted to display numberplates with smaller characters if:

The vehicle does not have European Community Whole Vehicle Type Approval
And

The vehicle's construction/ design cannot accommodate standard size plates
Specifications for numberplates
Standard size plates

Character Height
79mm

Character Width (except the figure 1 or I)
50mm

Character Stroke
14mm

Space between characters
11mm

Space between groups
33mm

Top, bottom and side margins (minimum)
11mm

Space between vertical lines
19mm


Smaller size plates (for certain imported vehicles)

Character Height
64mm

Character Width (except the figure 1 or I)
44mm

Character Stroke
10mm

Space between characters
10mm

http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/vehicle ... 559?page=2

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

That just says smaller, I can't see it says how small, just tells you the size of the characters and the spacing.
13 x 7 is the norm on Bongos - ours was inspected as a camper conversion and has passed two MOTs with them. Same thing on most Japanese imports AFAIK.
RobnKathryn

Post by RobnKathryn » Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:52 pm

Thanks for the quick reply Trevor. I've just spoken to VOSA who confirm that the height and width can be 64x44mm on a Japanese import, which is in accordance with mine, so I'm off back to the MOT station to appeal against their decision now.

Rob
neil/di
Bongolier
Posts: 471
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 4:52 pm
Location: Hadlow Down East Sussex

Post by neil/di » Thu Dec 27, 2007 4:01 pm

Good luck Rob.
Keep us informed
Neil
A Bongos is not just for christmas
wrster

Post by wrster » Thu Dec 27, 2007 6:06 pm

I think if you're registered as a motorcaravan then you don't legally need rear seat belts at all?
Ian
Supreme Being
Posts: 5984
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Bongo Mission Control

Post by Ian » Thu Dec 27, 2007 6:31 pm

You are correct. But WHERE FITTED, they must pass MOT requirements.
668. The Neighbour of The Beast.
bigdaddycain
Supreme Being
Posts: 10637
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Ince Lancs

Post by bigdaddycain » Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:48 pm

I'd go elsewhere in future robnkathryn...The tester is clued up enough to "assume" the plates aren't "legal"...but not clued up enough to realize that certain japanese imports are exempt from the "normal reg" size regulations.

It's reassuring to know that you have a thorough tester...but that thorough? :?

How many police cars have been driving behind you in the past and pulled you over for the reg plates? (none i bet).

The tester who did my last mot said he'd have failed my bongo for the skinny spacesaver... (which i'd just replaced with a full size spare,cheers dbo!)

Now, i have no idea if he was within his rights to do this, but i'd have gone along with his trained eye,and experience,and lost the spacesaver if it had still been fitted...That is a real safety related item,i can't see a bus stop being mown down cos the tester thinks the spacing is wrong on your reg plates... :lol:

This is an extension of the ridiculous (in some cases) health & safety rules that apply nowadays...

:lol: Was i ranting again? :lol:
ビッグダディケイン RIP Big Bank Hank (Imp the Dimp) 1957-2014
RobnKathryn

Post by RobnKathryn » Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:39 pm

Here's a quick belated update, oh and happy new year guys. Well, I returned to MOT place on Thursday as they'd asked me to and the tester wasn't there, so they wouldn't comment on his decision but gave me an extra day......how nice of them to compensate my inconvenience so generously.

Returned the following day and the guy immediately backed down and issued me a certificate, so all is ok now..just an annoying waste of time and effort.
User avatar
The Great Pretender
Supreme Being
Posts: 2671
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:10 pm
Location: Wigan

Post by The Great Pretender » Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:29 am

RobnKathryn wrote:Here's a quick belated update, oh and happy new year guys. Well, I returned to MOT place on Thursday as they'd asked me to and the tester wasn't there, so they wouldn't comment on his decision but gave me an extra day......how nice of them to compensate my inconvenience so generously.

Returned the following day and the guy immediately backed down and issued me a certificate, so all is ok now..just an annoying waste of time and effort.
Glad you got it sorted, but its disconcerting that the guy dont know his job.
I have used the same guy for years (Peter at Prospect Garage in Standish) really knows his job, and honest. If he says there is a problem I trust him. Use him as my eyes under the vehicle. Hope you can find 1 like him.

Happy new year........................hic............ :lol:
User avatar
helen&tony
Supreme Being
Posts: 9869
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Mot fail

Post by helen&tony » Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:41 am

Hi Rob-n-Kathryn
Glad to see you got it sorted. Go back next year....you know he won't try it twice.
Helen
In the beginning there was nothing , then God said "Let there be Light".....There was still nothing , but ,by crikey, you could see it better.
User avatar
mikeonb4c
Supreme Being
Posts: 22877
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:49 pm
Location: Living with Mango Bongo in the North West but with a tendency to roam
Contact:

Re: Mot fail

Post by mikeonb4c » Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:45 pm

helen&tony wrote:Hi Rob-n-Kathryn
Glad to see you got it sorted. Go back next year....you know he won't try it twice.
Helen
How true!! As Churchill advocated, always be magnanimous in victory.

The point here of course is how fantastically useful the collective knowledge and support on BF is - quite amazing and just what is required to take Mr Self-Important-KnowItAll to task!! 8)
Locked

Return to “Techie Stuff”