Engine Replacement - Total Unbelievable DISASTER
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:58 pm
Hi Folks
Fasten your seatbelts.
I purchased a refurbished engine from a West Midlands based engine company who have been mentioned very recently on the forum. I regret to say that things have not gone smoothly. If you are about to purchase an engine, please PM me for specific company details.
The following is a chronological sequence of events:
1. I purchased the engine on 5th June. The fitting of the engine (and new radiator) was completed by my garage in Bury on 25th June. I collected the Bongo on 30th June.
2. The Bongo was back with the garage on Sunday 1st July. It had 'back pressure' - it was spilling water out of the expansion tank. It did not overheat, but the cooling system was pressurised even when cold ten hours after being driven. When the expansion tank cap was released one could hear a loud release of pressure accompanied by gurgling...
3 My mechanic (recommended by Adrian, Japan Direct Service Centre, Back Bolton Road South, Bury, who does Manchester Campers Bongo work) double checked the obvious - it had been bled properly but he felt that the back-pressure problem could be caused by a hairline crack on the cylinder head or a head gasket problem.
4. Being a very cautious person I also went to Adrian who double checked his colleague's work, confirmed that all aspects of the refit was absolutely spot-on - including the bleeding - and agreed that there seemed to be a problem with the engine.
5. I phoned the engine company on the 5th July, explaining the problem. They expressed great surprise, describing the test bed process involved etc. They were to get back to me later in the day, but failed to ring.
6. I checked the vehicle on a daily basis over the next few days. I took the vehicle over to PegLeg Pete and we found that we were unable to successfully bleed. I had a dye-test done which revealed the presence of exhaust gases in the coolant system.
7. I contacted the engine company by fax on 18th July and also spoke to them by phone. They asked me to return the vehicle to my mechanic so that the temperature sensor pods could be checked. Their theory was that the engine had not been bled properly and that we had 'cooked' the engine. They said that they would speak to my garage directly and that they might well 'come up north to see the engine for themselves'.
8. I took the vehicle back to the garage the following day. The mechanic checked the temperature sensor pods in my presence and they were fully intact, indicating that there had been no overheating. (This simply confirms our own experience - the temperature has never risen beyond the 11 o'clock position). Three of the pods are easy to locate, one other is hidden around the back of the cylinder head. We were able to check this one by using torch and mirror.
9. I rang the engine company to inform him that the vehicle was back with the garage. They rang the garage the following day and spoke directly with the mechanic, telling him that they would either come to Bury to see the vehicle or they would have the vehicle brought down to their works.
10. I received a phone call from the engine company on 26th July, informing me of the following:
(a) They had 'no recollection' of telling me or the mechanic that they may well come north to look at the vehicle in Bury.
(b) That I would have to get the vehicle at my own expense back to their works.
(c) That as far as they were concerned, the mechanic has cooked the engine by not bleeding it properly, that their engines don't have faults - their pressure-testing etc is rigorous.
(11) Today, 27th July, I sent by Fax and recorded delivery a letter to the engine company outlining their responsibilities under The Sale of Goods Act 1979, specifically referring to the clause which states that 'goods purchased must be of a satisfactory quality and fit for the purpose'. I formally requested that they rectify the situation at their expense by either repairing the fault or by replacing the engine. Having paid by credit card, I was able to inform the engine company that this financial institution was involved and had 'equal liability' under the terms of the Sale of Goods Act.
I await developments.
Well Folks, there we have it. My Bongo is in dry dock, I am thousands down and the engine company is squirming - 'having no recollection' of statements they made to two individuals in two separate phone calls. Your input and opinions would be appreciated. For the record, the temperature sensor pods are all intact and the engine never once overheated for me or my mechanic. I have written copies of faxes and recorded delivery letters sent to the engine company...
Pat Mc Kenna
Fasten your seatbelts.
I purchased a refurbished engine from a West Midlands based engine company who have been mentioned very recently on the forum. I regret to say that things have not gone smoothly. If you are about to purchase an engine, please PM me for specific company details.
The following is a chronological sequence of events:
1. I purchased the engine on 5th June. The fitting of the engine (and new radiator) was completed by my garage in Bury on 25th June. I collected the Bongo on 30th June.
2. The Bongo was back with the garage on Sunday 1st July. It had 'back pressure' - it was spilling water out of the expansion tank. It did not overheat, but the cooling system was pressurised even when cold ten hours after being driven. When the expansion tank cap was released one could hear a loud release of pressure accompanied by gurgling...
3 My mechanic (recommended by Adrian, Japan Direct Service Centre, Back Bolton Road South, Bury, who does Manchester Campers Bongo work) double checked the obvious - it had been bled properly but he felt that the back-pressure problem could be caused by a hairline crack on the cylinder head or a head gasket problem.
4. Being a very cautious person I also went to Adrian who double checked his colleague's work, confirmed that all aspects of the refit was absolutely spot-on - including the bleeding - and agreed that there seemed to be a problem with the engine.
5. I phoned the engine company on the 5th July, explaining the problem. They expressed great surprise, describing the test bed process involved etc. They were to get back to me later in the day, but failed to ring.
6. I checked the vehicle on a daily basis over the next few days. I took the vehicle over to PegLeg Pete and we found that we were unable to successfully bleed. I had a dye-test done which revealed the presence of exhaust gases in the coolant system.
7. I contacted the engine company by fax on 18th July and also spoke to them by phone. They asked me to return the vehicle to my mechanic so that the temperature sensor pods could be checked. Their theory was that the engine had not been bled properly and that we had 'cooked' the engine. They said that they would speak to my garage directly and that they might well 'come up north to see the engine for themselves'.
8. I took the vehicle back to the garage the following day. The mechanic checked the temperature sensor pods in my presence and they were fully intact, indicating that there had been no overheating. (This simply confirms our own experience - the temperature has never risen beyond the 11 o'clock position). Three of the pods are easy to locate, one other is hidden around the back of the cylinder head. We were able to check this one by using torch and mirror.
9. I rang the engine company to inform him that the vehicle was back with the garage. They rang the garage the following day and spoke directly with the mechanic, telling him that they would either come to Bury to see the vehicle or they would have the vehicle brought down to their works.
10. I received a phone call from the engine company on 26th July, informing me of the following:
(a) They had 'no recollection' of telling me or the mechanic that they may well come north to look at the vehicle in Bury.
(b) That I would have to get the vehicle at my own expense back to their works.
(c) That as far as they were concerned, the mechanic has cooked the engine by not bleeding it properly, that their engines don't have faults - their pressure-testing etc is rigorous.
(11) Today, 27th July, I sent by Fax and recorded delivery a letter to the engine company outlining their responsibilities under The Sale of Goods Act 1979, specifically referring to the clause which states that 'goods purchased must be of a satisfactory quality and fit for the purpose'. I formally requested that they rectify the situation at their expense by either repairing the fault or by replacing the engine. Having paid by credit card, I was able to inform the engine company that this financial institution was involved and had 'equal liability' under the terms of the Sale of Goods Act.
I await developments.
Well Folks, there we have it. My Bongo is in dry dock, I am thousands down and the engine company is squirming - 'having no recollection' of statements they made to two individuals in two separate phone calls. Your input and opinions would be appreciated. For the record, the temperature sensor pods are all intact and the engine never once overheated for me or my mechanic. I have written copies of faxes and recorded delivery letters sent to the engine company...
Pat Mc Kenna