You've spent too many years singing rugby songs BobBob wrote:Or it could be driven by a bloomin' great wheel:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_stora
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrobus
Ahh Hmm...



Moderator: Doone
You've spent too many years singing rugby songs BobBob wrote:Or it could be driven by a bloomin' great wheel:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_stora
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrobus
Ahh Hmm...
mikeonb4c wrote:You've spent too many years singing rugby songs BobBob wrote:Or it could be driven by a bloomin' great wheel:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_stora
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrobus
Ahh Hmm...![]()
![]()
Very interesting scanner. Didn't we start following this one a few years back? I'd still be interested to know what efficiency loss results from adiabatic expansion (i.e. pressure drop as bottle contents cool during release if gas). Of course regenerative braking using compression of air back into the bottles would offset this
Though of course more work will have to be done to get the bottles up to pressure?scanner wrote:I think one of the advantages for Mexico City is the greater pressure differential as it is at quite an altitude.
If the air tank is compressed to the same pressure there as at sea level the "fuel capacity" should be greater.